Trade Anytime, Anywhere
Important Information
This website is managed by Ultima Markets’ international entities, and it’s important to emphasise that they are not subject to regulation by the FCA in the UK. Therefore, you must understand that you will not have the FCA’s protection when investing through this website – for example:
Note: Ultima Markets is currently developing a dedicated website for UK clients and expects to onboard UK clients under FCA regulations in 2026.
If you would like to proceed and visit this website, you acknowledge and confirm the following:
Ultima Markets wants to make it clear that we are duly licensed and authorised to offer the services and financial derivative products listed on our website. Individuals accessing this website and registering a trading account do so entirely of their own volition and without prior solicitation.
By confirming your decision to proceed with entering the website, you hereby affirm that this decision was solely initiated by you, and no solicitation has been made by any Ultima Markets entity.
I confirm my intention to proceed and enter this website Please direct me to the website operated by Ultima Markets , regulated by the FCA in the United KingdomIn today’s financial markets, managing risk is crucial for investors and traders alike. Whether you’re dealing with stocks, commodities, or cryptocurrencies, protecting your positions from unforeseen market moves is a key factor in long-term success. One popular yet often underutilized strategy to achieve this is the zero cost collar.
This strategy allows traders to hedge their positions without incurring the typical upfront costs associated with traditional options. But how does it work, and when should it be used? Let’s take a closer look.

A zero cost collar is an options strategy designed to protect an investor’s portfolio against potential downside risk, while simultaneously capping the upside. This strategy involves buying a put option and selling a call option on the same underlying asset, with the premiums of the two options effectively canceling each other out. This creates a “zero-cost” structure, where the investor does not pay any net premium for the trade.
To break it down:
The result? The investor gains downside protection with no upfront cost, but the potential for significant upside gains is limited to the strike price of the call option.
Let’s consider an example to illustrate how this strategy works in practice:
Imagine you hold 100 shares of a stock currently trading at $100 per share. You’re concerned about potential downside risk but also don’t want to sell the stock. Here’s how a zero cost collar might look:
Since the premium you receive from selling the call covers the cost of the put, you have effectively created a zero cost collar. This limits your downside risk to $90 per share (the strike price of the put) and caps your upside potential at $110 per share (the strike price of the call).

This strategy is appealing to many traders for several reasons:
The primary benefit of a zero cost collar is the downside protection it offers. If the market moves significantly lower, the protective put ensures that your losses are limited. This is especially useful during periods of heightened market volatility, such as after a major economic announcement or geopolitical events.
As the strategy is designed to be “zero cost,” there’s no net premium to pay. This makes it an attractive option for investors who want to protect their holdings without additional upfront expenses.
While the upside is capped, the investor still has the potential to benefit from some price appreciation up to the call’s strike price. In a moderately bullish market, this can offer a balanced risk-reward profile.
A zero cost collar is most effective when an investor wants to secure profits and limit losses in their portfolio, especially in volatile market conditions. It can be used in several situations, including:

While the zero cost collar provides several advantages, it is not without its limitations:
The biggest drawback of this strategy is the limitation on potential gains. If the underlying asset’s price rises sharply above the strike price of the call option, you will miss out on any profits above that level. In a bull market, this could result in missed opportunities.
While the zero cost collar is effective in managing risk during volatile markets, it’s less useful in stable or trending markets where large price moves are not expected. In such conditions, the collar could lead to missed profits due to the call cap.
While the strategy has no upfront cost, there may still be transaction fees involved when executing the options trades. Additionally, the bid-ask spreads in options can sometimes affect the overall effectiveness of the strategy.
The zero cost collar is often compared to other risk management strategies, such as buying protective puts or using stop-loss orders. Here’s how it stacks up:
A zero cost collar is an excellent choice for investors who want to hedge their positions without spending additional capital. It’s ideal for investors looking for a balance between protection and limited upside in volatile market conditions.
However, this strategy may not be suitable for those who are focused on unlimited upside potential or those who are not comfortable with options trading. It requires a good understanding of the options market, strike prices, and the mechanics of the strategy.
A zero cost collar is an options strategy that protects against downside risk while limiting upside, using a combination of buying a put and selling a call with no net premium cost.
It works by buying a put for protection and selling a call to offset the cost of the put, offering downside protection with a capped upside.
The main advantage is protection without upfront cost, while maintaining limited upside potential, making it ideal for volatile markets.
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, financial, investment, or other professional advice. No statement or opinion contained here in should be considered a recommendation by Ultima Markets or the author regarding any specific investment product, strategy, or transaction. Readers are advised not to rely solely on this material when making investment decisions and should seek independent advice where appropriate.