QQQ vs QQQM: Which Nasdaq ETF is Better?

QQQ vs QQQM: Which Nasdaq ETF is Better?

Choosing between QQQ vs QQQM can feel confusing because both funds are designed to track the same benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index, which represents the 100 largest non-financial companies traded on Nasdaq. In other words, you are not picking different “stock baskets” so much as choosing the ETF wrapper that best matches how you invest.

A good way to frame the decision is to start with QQQ’s long runway. A Nasdaq  analysis noted that $1,000 invested at QQQ’s launch would have grown to about $14,190 as of January 8, 2026, translating to an average annual return of about 10.4%, despite severe drawdowns along the way. This includes an 80%+ decline during the early-2000s bust.

That long-term record is why QQQ is widely followed. But today, many investors ask a second question: if QQQ exists, why does QQQM exist? The answer comes down to fees, liquidity, and how you plan to trade.

QQQ vs QQQM

Feature	QQQ	QQQM
Index tracked	Nasdaq-100 Index	Nasdaq-100 Index
Inception	1999	Oct 13, 2020
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.15%
Trading ecosystem	One of the most actively traded ETFs	Liquid, but far less traded than QQQ
Average volume	~57.56M shares/day	~5.24M shares/day (3-month avg)
Example close (Feb 24, 2026)	$607.87	$250.31

What Is QQQ?

QQQ, Invesco QQQ Trust is the “original” Nasdaq-100 ETF and has been trading since 1999. It is often used as a shorthand way to access large, innovation-focused companies in one fund.

Characteristics of QQQ:

• Liquidity: Invesco notes QQQ was the 2nd-most traded ETF in the U.S. (by average daily volume traded) as of Dec. 31, 2025.
  
• Growth and tech tilt: As of 12/31/2025, Invesco’s sector allocation for QQQ showed Technology at 63.28% and Consumer Discretionary at 17.89%, with smaller weights in areas like health care and industrials.
  

That concentration helps explain why QQQ can be a powerful long-term growth vehicle, but also why it tends to be more volatile than broad market funds.

What Is QQQM?

QQQM, Invesco Nasdaq-100 ETF launched in 2020 as a lower-cost Nasdaq-100 option. It tracks the same index as QQQ, so holdings and sector exposure are intended to be very similar.

Where QQQM stands out is simple:

• Lower annual fee (0.15%) than QQQ (0.18%).
  
• Lower share price in practice (because it has a shorter price history), which can make whole-share purchases feel easier for some investors.
  

For many buy-and-hold investors, QQQM is essentially “QQQ exposure with a slightly lower bill.”

QQQ vs QQQM: Key Differences Explained

Expense ratios and long-term cost

The fee gap is 0.03% per year (3 basis points): 0.18% for QQQ vs 0.15% for QQQM.

In dollar terms, the difference is straightforward:

• On $10,000, 0.03% equals $3 per year
  
• On $100,000, 0.03% equals $30 per year
  

For investors who truly buy and hold for years, that small annual difference can compound.

A competitor-content trap to avoid: many older QQQ vs QQQM articles still mention QQQ’s 0.20% fee and its older structure. Invesco reported that QQQ shareholders approved modernization that reduced the expense ratio to 0.18%, and the conversion also allows reinvesting income and participating in securities lending, with no tax implications from the conversion for QQQ investors.

Liquidity, spreads, and trading friction

Fees matter, but so does what you pay every time you trade. QQQ’s trading activity is on a different scale than QQQM’s:

• QQQ: about 57.56M average daily volume (MarketWatch data).
  
• QQQM: about 5.24M average daily volume over three months (Investing.com data).
  

Higher volume often translates to tighter bid-ask spreads and smoother execution, especially during volatile sessions. This is why QQQ is commonly favored by active traders and institutions, even if it is slightly more expensive on paper.

A practical way to think about it: if trading QQQ saves you more than a few basis points in spread and slippage over the year, that can easily offset QQQM’s 3 bps fee advantage. 

Options market depth

If you use options, QQQ is usually the more convenient ticker. Forbes notes that QQQM’s options market is “thin” compared with QQQ’s robust options market.

So for strategies like covered calls, protective puts, or hedging around earnings and macro events, QQQ is typically the path of least resistance.

Share price and fractional shares

The transcript point about “QQQ looks expensive per share” is real. QQQ’s long history means a higher share price, while QQQM’s shorter history usually means a lower per-share price. For example, on Feb 24, 2026, QQQ closed at $607.87 and QQQM closed at $250.31.

But share price does not change the underlying exposure. What matters is whether your broker supports fractional shares. Invesco notes you can typically invest in as little as one share, and some brokers allow investors to purchase a fraction of an ETF share.

If you can buy fractional shares, the “high price” fear factor becomes mostly psychological.

How to Choose Between QQQ and QQQM

If you are…	Usually choose	Why it is a better fit
A long-term investor contributing monthly and holding for years	QQQM	Slightly lower fee can help long-run compounding
An active trader who buys and sells regularly	QQQ	Much higher trading volume can mean better execution
An investor who uses options (covered calls, puts, spreads)	QQQ	Options market is typically deeper and more liquid
Investing small amounts and your broker does not support fractional shares	QQQM	Lower share price can make whole-share buys easier
Already holding one ETF in a taxable account with large unrealized gains	keep it	Switching can trigger taxes that outweigh small fee differences

Recent Updates in 2026

QQQ conversion, Nasdaq-100 methodology changes, and fund flows

Two updates make recent QQQ vs QQQM comparisons more “current” than many older posts.

1) QQQ is now a modern open-end ETF. ETF.com noted that QQQ’s conversion to a standard open-end ETF took effect on Dec. 22, 2025, with the expense ratio set at 0.18%.

2) Investors are still moving money around. ETF.com reported $3.9B in outflows from QQQ since the conversion, even with the fee cut and structural upgrade.

3) Nasdaq is considering a “fast entry” approach. Nasdaq’s February 2026 consultation and Reuters coverage describe a proposal that could allow certain newly listed large companies to enter the Nasdaq-100 after 15 trading sessions with at least five days’ notice, potentially increasing the index size temporarily. If adopted, both QQQ and QQQM would be affected, since both track the same index.

Conclusion

For most investors, QQQ vs QQQM is not about performance differences from holdings. It is about matching the fund to your behavior:

• Choose QQQM if you are building a long-term Nasdaq-100 position and want the slightly lower fee.
  
• Choose QQQ if you trade more actively or use options and want the deepest liquidity.
  

Either way, you are buying a tech-tilted, innovation-heavy slice of the Nasdaq-100, so be sure you are comfortable with the volatility that can come with that exposure. 

FAQs