Important Information
This website is managed by Ultima Markets’ international entities, and it’s important to emphasise that they are not subject to regulation by the FCA in the UK. Therefore, you must understand that you will not have the FCA’s protection when investing through this website – for example:
Note: Ultima Markets is currently developing a dedicated website for UK clients and expects to onboard UK clients under FCA regulations in 2026.
If you would like to proceed and visit this website, you acknowledge and confirm the following:
Ultima Markets wants to make it clear that we are duly licensed and authorised to offer the services and financial derivative products listed on our website. Individuals accessing this website and registering a trading account do so entirely of their own volition and without prior solicitation.
By confirming your decision to proceed with entering the website, you hereby affirm that this decision was solely initiated by you, and no solicitation has been made by any Ultima Markets entity.
I confirm my intention to proceed and enter this websiteCostco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ: COST) has long been a standout in the retail industry. Known for its membership-based warehouse model, bulk discounts, and loyal customer base, Costco has seen impressive growth over the years. However, many potential investors often ask: Has Costco stock ever split?
If you’re considering investing in Costco, understanding its stock split history, unique business model, and future growth prospects is essential.
In this article, we’ll explore the Costco stock split history, factors that influence its stock price, and what investors should know before making a decision.
Before exploring Costco’s stock split history, it’s important to understand what a stock split involves. A stock split occurs when a company increases the number of shares outstanding while maintaining its market capitalisation. For instance, in a 2-for-1 stock split, shareholders receive an additional share for each share they hold, while the stock price is halved. The split doesn’t affect the company’s value; it only makes the stock more accessible to a broader group of investors.
Costco has executed two stock splits in its history:
Since 2001, Costco has refrained from executing any additional stock splits. Today, with Costco’s stock price hovering near $1,000, many investors and analysts speculate whether the company will execute another stock split.
Given the shift in trading practices, particularly the rise of fractional shares, the need for a stock split has diminished, but the psychological impact of a lower stock price remains significant.
Costco’s decision to hold off on stock splits for over two decades comes down to several key factors:
Costco operates as a membership-based retailer, where much of its profitability comes from membership fees rather than direct product sales. This allows Costco to maintain lower prices for consumers while operating on relatively low margins. Its ability to offer everyday low prices, combined with the purchasing power it has as a retailer, enables Costco to maintain a competitive edge in the market.
However, while Costco has been a highly successful business, it is not a high-growth company. Revenue has grown at a compound annual rate of 9% over the past decade, and net income has increased at a slightly higher rate of 13.1%.
This solid performance, though impressive, has been overshadowed by multiple expansion, which refers to the growth in Costco’s stock price relative to its earnings and revenue. Investors have been willing to pay a premium for Costco’s stability and consistent performance, driving up its stock price.
Despite Costco’s strong fundamentals, its high valuation presents a significant risk for investors. With a P/E ratio of 59, Costco’s stock is priced for perfection. If Costco’s growth slows or if it fails to meet market expectations, the stock could face pressure.
Bullish Case: Costco’s unique membership model has provided it with a steady stream of revenue, ensuring a loyal customer base. The company’s ability to maintain low prices while driving profitability is a powerful business model. Costco’s historical outperformance of the broader market suggests that, as long as it maintains this model, it could continue to generate consistent, profitable growth.
Bearish Case: Costco’s high valuation presents a major risk. The company is not growing rapidly compared to other high-growth stocks, and its revenue growth has been relatively modest. The risk lies in multiple expansion, as it’s unlikely that Costco’s stock can continue to rise at the same rate as its P/E multiple without a corresponding acceleration in its earnings growth. Additionally, Costco faces the challenge of market saturation, particularly in mature markets where it has already established a significant presence.
If Costco were to execute another stock split, it would likely follow a 2-for-1 split ratio, reducing the stock price while doubling the number of shares outstanding. While this would not change the company’s overall value, it would have several potential benefits for investors:
While a Costco stock split could drive increased trading and make its stock more accessible to a wider audience, it wouldn’t address the more significant concern about Costco’s high valuation.
Investors should remain focused on the company’s long-term business fundamentals and growth potential, rather than relying on the potential for a stock split to improve stock performance.
In conclusion, while Costco has executed two stock splits in its history, it is unlikely to perform another one in the near future. The company’s focus on organic growth, its high level of institutional ownership, and the rise of fractional share trading all suggest that a costco stock split may not be necessary.
Investors should instead focus on Costco’s long-term growth prospects, its membership-driven business model, and its ability to maintain profitability in a competitive retail environment.
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, financial, investment, or other professional advice. No statement or opinion contained here in should be considered a recommendation by Ultima Markets or the author regarding any specific investment product, strategy, or transaction. Readers are advised not to rely solely on this material when making investment decisions and should seek independent advice where appropriate.